![]() 09/25/2013 at 03:31 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
This should be good...
Which would you rather own?
2003-04 Mercury Marauder
4.6L DOHC 32V V8
302hp
318tq
1994-96 Chevrolet Impala SS
5.7L 16V LT1 V8
260hp
330tq
![]() 09/25/2013 at 03:56 |
|
I vote Marauder.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 04:08 |
|
Seconded.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 04:31 |
|
The Impala looks gangster but I think the Mercury is probably the better performer. This is impossible...
![]() 09/25/2013 at 06:19 |
|
IIRC the Marauder was crippled by a too-tall final gear ratio.
Also, the Maurauder will always look like you inherited Grandma's car and added hastily-selected wheels from the local tire shop.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 07:40 |
|
The Impala is not as common so that.
Also I live in detroit, and anything on the panther platform makes you look like a drug dealer. So not that.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 08:00 |
|
SS, future classic whereas the Marauder will unfortunately be lost in the see of Crown Vics
![]() 09/25/2013 at 08:37 |
|
![]() 09/25/2013 at 08:39 |
|
I love this picture. I want the caprice, but I would be quite satisfied with the Maurauder.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 09:44 |
|
As a Grand Marquis owner (which I love) I vote caprice. Easier to mod and more unique.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 10:40 |
|
2003-04 Mercury Marauder, all day, every day. No questions asked. Why? Modular ford is why. Absolutely love that motor.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 12:56 |
|
I tried, maybe one day I can pick up a DCM SS
![]() 09/25/2013 at 12:56 |
|
you know they made 10 times as many impala SS's as they did marauders?
![]() 09/25/2013 at 12:58 |
|
They had 3.55's but they really should of had 4.10's. It also doesn't help that ford de-tuned everything
The marauder also had less in common with the marquis than the impala did with the caprice. The impala on the outside was just a grille and wheels, the marauder has its own bumpers with fog lights as well as tips, headlights, corner lights, tail lights....
![]() 09/25/2013 at 13:57 |
|
I own a Marauder, but at one point was considering buying a 1996 Impala SS as a stablemate. This was probably 2008, and the car had about 80k on it if I recall correctly.
Anyway, the point is, I am probably one of only a hundred people who's actually driven both more than around the block - I gave the '96 a serious test drive after all. All I can say is that the Impala would kill the Marauder from a dead stop, but the Marauder was definitely faster from a roll.
When it comes to suspension, though, there's no contest: the Marauder handled and just plain felt better as a car, and better than the 2V Panthers it shared the platform with (disclaimer: I've owned 3 Grand Marquis). The Impala felt like a standard B-body with maybe a sway bar.
Overall?
Advantage: Marauder. There's a reason I didn't buy the Impala.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 14:35 |
|
The Marauder needed more differentiation. Long-term, that might make the remaining low-mileage examples worth more than the easily-faked Impala, and short term it's got a seven-years-newer advantage. But there's something about that whale's lines and its waiting-for-any-hot-smallblock engine bay that's appealing, even through the thick smoke of all the totally-ragged-out examples rolling through America's rougher neighborhoods these days.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 15:12 |
|
Then Marauders? Nope, I knew their number were low too but not that low.
Either way I was referring to how you 100x more Crown Vics, Grand Marquis or Marauders. Aesthetically there is much of an difference. IMO thats like saying there aren't very many GT/SC Mustangs around. Which is true, but there is a boat load of V6's.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 15:37 |
|
the only reason theirs not many B bodies on the road is because the last year was 1996. I'm sure in 10-15-20 years time you won't see many panthers around either.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 20:10 |
|
Dodge Charger.
![]() 09/25/2013 at 20:20 |
|
Listen here u lil shit ^
You can't lonnie tune a LX platform!